browser icon
You are using an insecure version of your web browser. Please update your browser!
Using an outdated browser makes your computer unsafe. For a safer, faster, more enjoyable user experience, please update your browser today or try a newer browser.

CLoud Foundation Action Alert: Help Nevada’s Desatoya Herd By April 4th

Posted by on March 29, 2012
Dear Wild Horse & Burro Defenders;

Please help the Desatoya Wild Horse herd in central Nevada by commenting on the helicopter stampede and removal plan in which the vast majority of wild horse families would lose their freedom later this year. As many as 500 horses could be removed from their legally designated Wild Horse Herd Management Area of over 160,000 acres. BLM is only allowing for 127-180 wild horses, while permitting the year round grazing of 600 head of privately owned livestock.

Wild horses of Nevada

Instead of preparing an Environmental Assessment (EA) for just the wild horse removal, BLM has included this wild horse action as part of a habitat restoration project EA. The “restoration” plan calls for the cutting of pinyon, juniper and sagebrush to improve the habitat for threatened populations of sage grouse. Yes, that’s right—destroying sagebrush habitat to help struggling sage grouse populations.  It is easy to conclude that the “restoration” might also create more grazing land for welfare cattle. Livestock damage is the major cause of declining sage grouse populations throughout the West.

thanks from Ginger, Cloud Foundation

Comments are due Wednesday, April 4

28 March 2012

Please submit your comments to BLM’s “Desatoya Mountains Habitat Resiliency, Health, and Restoration Project,” which is available here if you feel like a little light reading.

calico2_1
Two horses chased by the helicopter at the Calico Roundup in Dec. 2011

Below is a sample letter with bullet points. Please use your own polite words.

Comments must be submitted by Wednesday, April 4th, no later that the close of business day at 4:30 PDT.

Comments can be submitted via mail to:

BLM Carson City District Office
Attn: John Wilson & John Axtell
5665 Morgan Mill Rd
Carson City, NV 89701

Or via email at: desatoyaEA@blm.gov with “Desatoya EA comments” in the subject line.

Dear Sir;

  • Look at alternatives that allow the wild horses to remain on their ranges with their families

    1. Allocate more forage to Wild Horses and increase the wild horse AML (Appropriate Management Level
    2. Reduce the number of cattle grazing in this Wild Horse Herd Area
    3. Focus on range improvements (i.e. water guzzlers, noxious/invasive weed treatment, etc.)

  • Consider the use of the one-year reversible, field-dartable version of PZP combined with water/bait-trapping in lieu of costly and cruel helicopter stampedes
  • Do not consider skewing wild horse sex ratios which will only cause social disruption and injury and has the potential to actually increase reproduction
  • Conduct an accurate, current census using the most up-to-date technology prior to any removal of wild horses.
  • Do not count wild horse foals in calculating the AML per your own BLM Handbook
  • In any removal action Standard Operating Procedures should include:

    1. Temperature & distance parameters if helicopter stampedes are conducted
    2. No removal of older animals—allow older horses the dignity of dying a natural death them on the range

 

Sincerely,

[Your name]

Here’s some more information about the Desatoya Environmental Assessment plan:

As many as 500 horses could be removed from their legally designated Wild Horse Herd Management Area of over 160,000 acres. BLM is only allowing for only 127-180 wild horses while permitting the year round grazing of 600 head of privately owned livestock.

Instead of preparing an Environmental Assessment (EA) for just the wild horse removal, BLM has included this wild horse action as part of a habitat restoration project EA. The “restoration” plan calls for the cutting of pinyon, juniper and sagebrush to improve the habitat for threatened populations of sage grouse. Yes, that’s right—destroying sagebrush habitat to help struggling sage grouse populations.  It is easy to conclude that the “restoration” might also create more grazing land for welfare cattle. Livestock damage has been the major cause of declining sage grouse populations throughout the West.

Comments are closed.